All sources, search for source

For this present recording scheme we basically used two kinds of data sources:

  1. publicly available publications and unpublished survey reports and academic papers, and
  2. private collections and private faunistic databases.

The review of faunistic publications is nearly complete only for Nord Rhine-Westphalia (reviewed by Dr. Martin Kreuels) und Rhineland-Palatinate (reviewed by Annette Lehna and Horst Krummenauer). In 2003 the review of material for Baden-Württemberg was completed (reviewed by D. Nährig, K.-H. Harms, J. Kiechle und J. Spelda).

For the rest of Germany the percentage of reviewed literature is probably below 50%.

We like to take this opportunity to thank all persons who provided data from their collections and databases!

5 sources:

Blick T, Achury R, Goßner M, Seibold S, Staab M & Weisser W (2021, unpublished): Biodiversitäts-Exploratorien, DFG Schwerpunktprogramm 1374 - Bereich Infrastruktur: Spinnen (Araneae) aus den Jahren 2008 bis 2018 in der Region Hainich (Thüringen).Inst. Ecology, Uni Jena & Dept. Ökologie und Ökosystemmanagement, TU München 
Blick T & Seibold S (2021, unpublished): Bodenfallen- und Eklektorfänge von Spinnen aus Grünland in Freising. 
Blick T & Seibold S (2021, unpublished): Spinnen aus Totholz aus dem Bayerischen Wald. 
Muster C, Achury R, Goßner M, Seibold S, Staab M & Weisser W (2021, unpublished): Biodiversitäts-Exploratorien, DFG Schwerpunktprogramm 1374 - Bereich Infrastruktur: Weberknechte und Pseudoskorpione (Opiliones, Pseudoscorpiones) aus den Jahren 2008 bis 2018 in der Region Hainich (Thüringen).Inst. Ecology, Uni Jena & Dept. Ökologie und Ökosystemmanagement, TU München 
Seibold S, Bässler C, Baldrian P, Reinhard L, Thorn S, Ulyshen MD, Weiss I & Müller J (2016): Dead-wood addition promotes non-saproxylic epigeal arthropods but effects are mediated by canopy openness.Biological Conservation 204B: 181–188; DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.031