All sources, search for source

For this present recording scheme we basically used two kinds of data sources:

  1. publicly available publications and unpublished survey reports and academic papers, and
  2. private collections and private faunistic databases.

The review of faunistic publications is nearly complete only for Nord Rhine-Westphalia (reviewed by Dr. Martin Kreuels) und Rhineland-Palatinate (reviewed by Annette Lehna and Horst Krummenauer). In 2003 the review of material for Baden-Württemberg was completed (reviewed by D. Nährig, K.-H. Harms, J. Kiechle und J. Spelda).

For the rest of Germany the percentage of reviewed literature is probably below 50%.

We like to take this opportunity to thank all persons who provided data from their collections and databases!

Legend: is currently revised, low detail level, medium detail level, high detail level

3 sources:

Bali L, Andrési D, Tuba K & Szinetár C (2019): Comparing pitfall trapping and suction sampling data collection for ground-dwelling spiders in artificial forest gaps.Arachnologische Mitteilungen 58: 23–28; DOI: 10.30963/aramit5808
Gajdoš P, Szinetár C, Román K, Šestáková A, Purgat P & Černecká Ľ (2020): Clubiona pseudoneglecta and Paratrachelas maculatus, two spider species new to the Slovak fauna (Araneae: Clubionidae, Trachelidae).Arachnologische Mitteilungen 60: 44–49; DOI: 10.30963/aramit6009 
Kovács P, Szinetár C & Szűts T (2012): A nyugat-magyarországi peremvidék (Győr-Moson-Sopron, Vas és Zala megyék) pókfaunája. The spider fauna of the West-Hungarian region (Győr-Moson-Sopron, Vas and Zala counties).A Nyme Savaria Egyetemi Központ Tudományos Közleményei XIX. Természettudományok 14: 165–229